|

The Day After
Tomorrow
Have you ever been offended by a movie?
I'm not talking about just being mad because a movie
sucked, I'm talking offended. When the closing
credits ran I felt like Elmer Fudd with a carrot shoved
in the barrel of my gun. I've been here before.
The plot in a nutshell is a brilliant
scientist knows how the world will end based on all
kinds of cheap TV movie of the week style science.
Of course the powers that be don't believe him until
it's almost too late. So many disasters ensue
including tornadoes in Los Angles, massive flooding in
New York, and finally a massive temperature drop that
instantly freezes anyone outside. Anyone inside
with no heat but a small fire will survive it oddly
enough.
Dennis Quaid, in his most passionless
flat performance to date, plays the brave scientist who
has decided to trek to New York through the deadly
frozen tundra that is the United States to save his son.
Since there are no airlines to take and no means of
major travel, what he plans to do when he gets to his
son is anyone's guess. but he must get to him
because he has neglected him to much in the past because
of his work! Jake Gyllenhaal plays the brilliant
son who is of course infatuated with a girl on his
scholastic team but he is to shy to tell her.
The idea of the film is just so
implausible. A major climate change occurs in a
matter of a few days and is gone in a day. Don't
get me wrong I can enjoy popcorn science fiction as much
as the next guy but this movie is insulting in its lack
of originality. The movie is promoted as "from the
creators of Independence Day!" Now I know why
nobody's getting sued. If this movie were made by
someone other than those filmmakers they could sue for
plagiarism. As it stands director Roland Emmrich
just remade Independence Day, his own movie, and
replaced the alien invasion with a natural disaster.
Maybe the makers The Core have got
a shot at a law suit because it's almost identical to
that film as well. How many times must we see the
brilliant scientist predict the tragedy, get rejected,
then get brought in to tell the President what he should
do, then have to face some personal impending tragedy
that just barely manages not to really be a tragedy?
How many times must we have a disaster movie where the
President makes his patriotic speech near the end of the
film to rally the American people into rebuilding their
destroyed country (Deep Impact,
Independence Day)? How many times to we
have to watch a bunch of smart assed scientists or
others we don't really like give up the ghost and kiss
their asses good bye (Armageddon, Deep
Impact)? This particular aspect of this story
was handled amazingly well in Titanic.
What could have been interesting is to
have these disasters occur and focus on the common man
and his struggle to survive in the face of a situation
he can't control or understand. instead of focusing on
the one and only scientist who knows the answer and his
struggle to be heard. The way to ground these
fantastic type of stories is to find a way to humanize
them, to let the viewer identify with characters in the
film. but this takes character development not
drawing a silhouette on the screen that represents the
same stereotypical characters we've been seeing in these
films for a dozen years or more. When you take a
look at "the original" Time Machine, or god for bid pick
up the book, it's obvious that what transpires is
impossible but the character's motivations are real and
they help ground the story.
Maybe The Day After Tomorrow would
have been better if they had simply centered the story
around Dennis Quaid's character going to save his son.
Let him have a ton of near misses and run into some
amazing set pieces along the way but keep the story
focused and grounded to the characters. But they
would have to give Quaid's character a plan once he
reached his son other than just finding him. I
kept thinking to myself what the hell is he gonna do
once he gets there? Who does he think he is,
Superman?
The worst sequence for me in the film is
when the group of surviving kids is literally chased
through the library they are hold up in by the
temperature change. It's just so ridiculous.
Oh by the way the lame romance that is "forced" in the
film is boring and cardboard due to the fact that, well
it's poorly written, and the two main players have about
as much chemistry Bill and Hillary on two for one lap
dance night at the Booby Bungalow.
With this film and Van Helsing
kicking off the summer '04 movie season I don't have
high hopes for the rest of the month. I'll be
happy to clean my movie going pallet with Spider-man
2 or the new Harry Potter film. In case
I didn't make it clear this movie isn't good, in fact
it's horrible. It's actually worse than Van
Helsing because it's better to try and bring something
new to the screen and fail rather than to strive to the
exact same movie with each one you direct. Curse
you Roland Emmrich, you took two hours of my life I'll
never get back.
1/10
-Stephen Lackey |