Let's get this out of the way first, this is not a zombie movie,
this is not a zombie franchise. This is a film that's more
akin to another of George Romero's film's; The Crazies.
In that film people are infected and they go crazy killing and
eating each other, sound familiar? A zombie is "the living
dead". These people aren't dead yet and they can mostly be
killed with shots to the torso as well as to the head which isn't
the case in the zombie formula.
In the first film of this franchise,
28 Days Later,
a man awakens after being in a coma for 28 Days only to find
London's citizens infected with some sort of disease that drives
them insane causing them to kill and eat each other. That
movie follows this man as he meets others that aren't infected and
he travels with them to an area they will be safe until they can be
rescued or the disease runs its course.
In this sequel it's
28 Weeks Later and London has
been evacuated of the uninfected and the infected have either all
died of starvation or been exterminated by American forces who have
come in to help clean up the mess. New housing has been built
and citizens are slowly being brought back into London as the
cleanup continues.
Two children a brother and his older sister are brought back to
London to reunite with their father who never left, The
children were away on a school trip when the infection broke out and
they were never able to come home. Their father and mother hid
from the infected with a small group of survivors until one day the
infected broke into the house they were staying in. Once the
father and mother were separated in the house rather than try to
save his wife the father ran for his own and it paid off for him
because he survived. He has lived with this guilt for some
time and now since the family is reunited he also has to deal with
the judging eyes of his children.
So, the children want some of their personal belongings including a
picture of their mother. In one of the first big plot holes in
the film the children are able to fairly simply subvert the military
security and get back into the section of London where their house
is located. Maybe the ease in which they escape is supposed to
be some sort of political comment but if it
is it's not apparent. Once home they find their mother,
who is infected but doesn't seem to be suffering from the symptoms
of the infection. After some examination military doctors
conclude that she is a carrier of the infection but immune to the
symptoms.
In the second really huge plot hole the husband is able to use his
key card to get through all of the military security and into the
room where his wife is being examined. Now, it's made clear
early on that he runs the building where all of the citizens live
but that doesn't mean his clearance should extend all the way
through the military's most secure areas. This plot hole
bothered me the most because it was so obviously a piece of lazy
writing. Anyway, he kisses his wife, passes the infection, and
so it all begins again.
Obviously the writing is weak. After the film ended I
commented to one of my friends that I believed the script for the
film must have only been about five pages long. Outside of the
writing though, there were some excellent tense moments, a few good
jumps, some surprisingly brutal killings, and one of the most unique
killings involving night vision since
Silence of the Lambs.
So, at the end of the film, it wasn't well written but it was a fun
horror experience. It featured a sparse score that along with
the quieter scenes of desolation reminded me of a John Carpenter
film from the 80's. I had fun, but I won't remember this film
the way I do the first one, as a unique film that's a near classic.
28 Weeks Later is just a gory distraction to fill
the void until something better comes along.